Archive for September, 2007

Commas, too?

Sunday, September 9th, 2007

CITIZEN’S ARREST:  Grammar cop deputy Dena writes:

“… My specific question concerns the use of the word “too.”  I was taught, hundreds of years ago, that one inserts a comma before “too.”  I rarely see others do that now and realized that this rule, too, must have changed.Would you please lay out a simple way for me to know when to use a comma and when it isn’t necessary, according to today’s rules?”

Dena, you’re correct in expecting to see a comma before the adverb “too.”  Setting off single word dependent clauses has fallen out of favor, but it’s still correct usage.  For example:

You can’t have your cake and eat it too.  This sentence needs a comma after “it” because you’re adding a word that modifies “eat.”  Without the comma, the reader is looking for another word for “too” to modify. (You can’t have your cake and eat it too quickly?  You can’t have your cake and eat it too often?  See what I mean?)

The correct structure is: You can’t have your cake and eat it, too.  Likewise, you should have a comma following an introductory clause (even a one-word clause): Additionally, I eat the cake that I’ve obtained.  Finally, I’m able to eat all the cake I have.

Hope that helps.  Remember, just because you see something in usage doesn’t make it acceptable or correct (Look at the proliferation of “alright” and “reoccur,” neither of which is a word). 

Cheryl

Where have all the editors gone?

Monday, September 3rd, 2007

Doesn’t anyone understand the objective vs nominative case pronouns anymore?

I read two–three books a week and find grammar boo boos in almost every one. That’s understandable, since sometimes it’s one of my own books I’m reading *LOL*  Still, I get perturbed at the hoops that we writers jump through to submit letter-perfect material only to have it show up in print wrong.  I know, it’s still a reflection on the author, but still.  Where are all the editors who are supposed to be…well, editing?

Last night I was reading a book by one of my favorite authors, a witty and intelligent woman (No names in this blog, please!), and came across the following phrase:
By the time the EMTs scooted Susie and I out of the way…  Screech!  Nails on blackboard time.

“I” is the object of the verb “scooted,” is it not? And “I” in the objective case is “me.”  So where was the editor when this went to print?

Another story in the newspaper stated that such-and-such gave to she and her husband–hello?  Isn’t “gave” the verb?  The objective form of she is her, not sheSheesh!

I’m old enough to remember sentence **gulp!** diagramming.  Maybe if we still diagrammed our sentences, we’d have a clearer picture in our mind of sentence structure.  We’d know that the verb and a preposition are followed by an object, not a subject.

Please, when in doubt, look it up. Or write to the Grammar Cop!

Cheryl